STUDY ON THE OPINION OF STAKEHOLDERS ON FORESTRY ECOSYSTEM SERVICES

Authors

  • Elena Dragozova University of Forestry, Bulgaria
  • Nevena Shuleva University of Forestry, Bulgaria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12955/peb.v1.15

Keywords:

water, forest,, ecosystem services, water protection function

Abstract

The ecosystem services provided by forest areas have a direct and indirect impact on the quality of life of people and also increase the well-being of society. The regulatory and water protection function of forests is institutionalized in the European and Bulgarian legislation.

In the context of the current crisis in the water sector in Bulgaria there is a need to identify the stakeholder groups involved in the management, protection, control and use of the water ecosystem service. Under the crisis of water management in Bulgaria we understand the reduction of the volume of water resources and difficulties in supplying clean water to the population. Their opinion on the ecosystem of the forest and its water protection function in particular was examined by conducting a survey. The current paper identifies the different stakeholder groups and presents an analysis of the results obtained by means of a questionnaire sent to stakeholders. The results obtained are used as a basis for forming institutional links and managing conflicts in the process of generating, protecting and managing water from its source to the user. The study proved that society makes sense of the connection between the forest and the provision of clean water. Through the study, we succeeded in identifying a major problem related to the incomplete and outdated information on the maintenance of ecosystem services and improvement of the quality of the goods generated from them which is due to the poor communication between institutions coupled with the lack of awareness by the direct responsibilities of various departments and positions. The electronic platform created for the project on the one hand will support the process of information security of the technical mapping of water sources and water protection forests, as well as provide an opportunity for communication with various stakeholders. This will enable a higher information security.

Author Biographies

Elena Dragozova, University of Forestry, Bulgaria

University of Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria

Nevena Shuleva, University of Forestry, Bulgaria

University of Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria

References

BISE. (2019). MAES-related developments in the European Union. Retrieved from https://biodiversity.europa.eu/countries/countries-sections-v3##maes. Accessed on: 2020-1-05.

Burkhard, B., Kandziora, M., Hou, Y., Müller, F. (2014). Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3097/lo.201434

Burkhard, B., & Maes, J .(2017) Mapping Ecosystem Services. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, 374 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/ab.e12837

CBD.(2010). Convention on Biological Divesity. Retrieved from http://www.cbd.int/cop10/insession/.

Costanza, R., et al. (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387 (6630): 253‑260. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0

Crossman, N., et al. (2013). A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 4: 4‑14. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001

Daily, G.C. (Ed.) (1997) Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington DC. [ISBN 1-55963-475-8]

de Groot, R.S. (1992). Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and Decision Making. Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff. xviii + 315p, illustrated, soft cover. ISBN 90-01-35594-3. Dfl 80. Polar Record 29 (169): 162. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247400023779

Dimopoulos, P. et al. (2017). The need for the implementation of an Ecosystem Services assessment in Greece: drafting the national agenda. One Ecosystem 2: e13714. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.2.e13714

Dunford, R., et al. (2018) Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situations. Ecosystem Services 29: 499‑514. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.014

EASAC (2009) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: an interim report. European Communities. Clyvedon Press Ltd, Cardiff.

Egoh, B., Drakou, E., Dunbar, M., Maes, J., Willemen, L. (2012) Indicators for mapping ecosystem services: a review. Publications Office of the European Union, 2012. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3420.2565

Galaz, V., Gars, J., Moberg, F., Nykvist, B., Repinski, C. (2015) Why Ecologists Should Care about Financial Markets. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30 (10): 571‑580. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.06.015

Jacobs, S, et al. (2016) A new valuation school: Integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions. Ecosystem Services 22: 213‑220. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.007

Kolev, K. (2010). Research on economic conflicts in Bulgarian forestry. Forest Science, 3, 65-82. (in Bulgarian)

Liquete, C., Zulian, G., Delgado, I., Stips, A., Maes, J. (2013) Assessment of coastal protection as an ecosystem service in Europe. Ecological Indicators 30: 205‑217. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.02.013

Mederly, P., et al.(2020) National ecosystem services assessment in Slovakia – meeting old liabilities and introducing new methods. One Ecosystem 5: e53677. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.5.e53677

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington DC, 141 pp. [ISBN 1-59726-040-1]

Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works.(2012). Strategy for Development and Management of the Water Supply and Sanitation Sector in the Republic of Bulgaria 2014 -2023. Published 2012. Retrieved from https://www.mrrb.bg/static/media/ups/articles/attachments/62198bceb42f42e4db4f3864ebdf5ffe.pdf

Nedkov, S., et al. (2018) Towards integrated mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services in Bulgaria: The Central Balkan case study. One Ecosystem 3: e25428. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e25428

Nedkov, S., Zhiyanski, M., Borisova, B., Bratanova-Doncheva, S. (2018) Mapping and assessment of ecosystem condition and ecosystem services across different scales and domains in Europe. One Ecosystem 3. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e29288

Schröter, M., et al. (2016) National Ecosystem Assessments in Europe: A Review. BioScience 66 (10): 813‑828. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw101

TEEB (2010) The economics of the ecosystem and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature. United Nations Environment Programme, Geneva, 36 pp. [ISBN 978-3-9813410-3-4]

Tsoklinova, M., Delkov, Al. (2019). Factors Inducing on Consumption of Ecosystem Service Tourism, Journal of Balkan Ecology, Volume 22, No 3.

Yovkov, I., Shuleva, N. (2011), Water production function in forest management models, S., 195 ISBN: 978-954-323-827-9.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-16

How to Cite

Dragozova, E. ., & Shuleva, N. . (2020). STUDY ON THE OPINION OF STAKEHOLDERS ON FORESTRY ECOSYSTEM SERVICES. Proceedings of CBU in Economics and Business, 1, 37-44. https://doi.org/10.12955/peb.v1.15