THE ROLE OF POLITICAL STABILITY IN FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ATTRACTION: CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Rogneda Groznykh Ural Federal University, Russian Federation
  • Oleg Mariev Ural Federal University, and The Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation
  • Sergey Plotnikov Ural Federal University, Russian Federation
  • Maria Fominykh Ural Federal University, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12955/peb.v1.22

Keywords:

Foreign Direct Investment, Institutional Environment, Gravity Model, Government Stability, Internal and External Conflicts, Democracy

Abstract

This study is devoted to the evaluation and scrutiny of political stability as a determinant of foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows to different countries. The primary objective of the research is to estimate the impact and influence of various indicators of political stability on foreign direct investment inflows. The analysis is delivered based on a database on cross-country FDI inflows of 66 FDI-importer countries and 98 FDI-exporter countries, in the period between 2001-2018. This article uses the assumption that the impact of political stability might be different for both the groups of developed and developing countries. As the developed economies have higher political stability, they tend to attract larger amounts of foreign direct investment compared to developing economies, where the political situation can be less stable. Furthermore, the estimation applies the gravity approach, while the main method used for the econometric calculations is the Pseudo Poisson Maximum Likelihood (PPML) regression. The outcome revealed that in most cases the indicators of political stability had a positive impact on the foreign direct investment inflows. However, the results are not constant for all groups of countries. Therefore, if a developed country is an importer of investment, then most of the indicators of political stability become significant and have a positive influence on the foreign direct investment. At the same time, if the importer is a developing country, then for the investor-developed economy, political stability becomes a significant factor. Similarly, if the FDI-exporter is a developing economy, then determinants of political stability are insignificant. Based on these results, possible recommendations for refined government policies can be suggested.

Author Biographies

Rogneda Groznykh, Ural Federal University, Russian Federation

Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Department of Econometrics and Statistics, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation

Oleg Mariev, Ural Federal University, and The Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation

Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Department of Econometrics and Statistics, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation

Institute of Economics, The Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation

Sergey Plotnikov, Ural Federal University, Russian Federation

Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Department of Econometrics and Statistics, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation

Maria Fominykh, Ural Federal University, Russian Federation

Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Department of Econometrics and Statistics, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation

References

Bitar, Nicholas & Hamadeh, Mohamad & Khoueiri, Roy. (2019). Impact of Political Instability on Foreign Direct Investment in Lebanon. Asian Social Science. 16.41.10.5539/ass.v16n1p41.

Benassy-Quere, A., Couper, M., Mayer, T. (2007). Institutional Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment. The World Economy, 30 (5), 764-782. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01022.x

Bevan, A., Estrin, S., Meyer, K. (2004) Foreign investment location and institutional development in transition economies. International Business Review, 13 (1), 43-64. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2003.05.005

Brunetti, A., Weder, B. (1998). Investment and Institutional Uncertainty: A comparative Study of Uncertainty Measures. Review of World Economics, 134 (3), 513-533. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02707928

Daude, Ch., Stein, E. (2007, February). The Quality of Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment. Economics and Politics, 19 (3), 317-344. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2007.00318.x

Fry, Maxwell J., Classens, Stijn, Burridge, Peter & Blanchet, M. C. (1995). Foreign direct investment, other capital flows, and current account deficits: What causes what? World Bank Policy Research Paper 1527, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Groznykh R., Mariev O. (2019). Impact of Institutional Factors on Foreign Direct Investment Inflows: Cross-Country Analysis. Journal of Economic Theory, 16 (2), 305-311. https://dx.doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-2.11

Knack, S., Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures. Economics and Politics, 7(3), 207-227. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.1995.tb00111.x

Mádr M., Kouba L. (2015). Does the Political Environment Affect Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment? Evidence from Emerging Markets. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(6), 2017–2026.

Mariev O., Drapkin I., Chukavina K. (2016) Is Russia successful in attracting foreign direct investment? Evidence based on gravity model estimation. Review of Economic Perspectives. 16(3), 245-267. https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2016-0015

Mayer, T., Zignago, S. (2011, December). Notes on CEPII’s distances measures: The GeoDist database. CEPII Working Papers, 2011-25. Retrieved from: http://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/publications/wp/abstract.asp?NoDoc=3877

Silva S., Tenreyro, S. (2006) The Log of Gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 88(4), 641-658. https://dx.doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.4.641

Singh, Harinder, & Jun, K. W. (1995). Some new evidence on determinants of foreign direct investment in developing countries. World Bank Policy Research Paper 1531, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Tintin C. (2013) The determinants of foreign direct investment inflows in the Central and Eastern European Countries: The importance of institutions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 46, pp. 287–298. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2013.03.006

The PRS Group (2018). International Country Risk Guide Methodology. Retrieved from: https://www.prsgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/icrgmethodology.pdf

Downloads

Published

2020-11-16

How to Cite

Groznykh, R. ., Mariev, O. ., Plotnikov, S. ., & Fominykh, M. . (2020). THE ROLE OF POLITICAL STABILITY IN FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ATTRACTION: CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS. Proceedings of CBU in Economics and Business, 1, 76-83. https://doi.org/10.12955/peb.v1.22