DETERMINANTS OF SME ACCESS TO PUBLIC PROCUREMENT: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE VISEGRAD GROUP COUNTRIES

Authors

  • Peter Nemec Technical University of Košice, Faculty of Economics, Department of Regional Sciences and Management https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6067-6788
  • Peter Džupka Technical University of Košice, Faculty of Economics, Department of Regional Sciences and Management

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12955/peb.v2.257

Keywords:

public procurement, SMEs, most economically advantageous tender

Abstract

This article aims to investigate the factors influencing the success of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in public procurement in the Visegrad Group Countries. According to the European Union, tools such as the division of contracts into smaller lots or the evaluation of tenders based on the most economically advantageous tender (MEAT) increase the chances of SME’s winning contracts in public procurement. In particular, the evaluation of tenders based on MEAT rather than the lowest price is a tool favoring SMEs, as it boosts their innovative potential, which creates the preconditions for achieving the best value for taxpayers' money. By analyzing more than 150,000 contract award notices published in the Tenders Electronic Daily in 2019, we found a positive effect on SMEs' chances of winning a contract when using framework agreements or dividing contracts into smaller lots. Moreover, the results of multinomial logit regression suggest that the evaluation of tenders based on MEAT rather than lowest prices increases the chances of SMEs to win the contract by more than 50%. However, the findings that the share of SMEs in the total financial value of contracts is less than 20%, with SMEs winning more than 60% of all contracts, suggest that some obstacles of SMEs' access to public contracts, such as financial, administrative or technical complexity of projects may persist and require further research.

References

Akenroye, T. O., Owens, J. D., Elbaz, J., & Durowoju, O. A. (2020). Dynamic capabilities for SME participation in public procurement. Business Process Management Journal, 26(4), 857–888. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2019-0447

Aschhoff, B., & Sofka, W. (2009). Innovation on demand-Can public procurement drive market success of innovations? Research Policy, 38(8), 1235–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.011

Cabras, I. (2011). Mapping the spatial patterns of public procurement. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 24(3), 187–205.

Edler, J., & Yeow, J. (2016). Connecting demand and supply: The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation. Research Policy, 45(2), 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.010

European Commission. (2020). An SME Strategy for a sustainable and digital Europe.

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0103

European Commission. (2017). European Semester: Thematic factsheet - Public procurement - 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/file_import/european-semester_thematic-factsheet_public-procurement_en_0.pdf

European Commission. (2019a). Analysis of the SMEs’ participation in public procurement and the measures to support it - 697/PP/GRO/IMA/18/1131/10226. Final report. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/42102/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native

European Commission. (2019b). Annual report on European SMEs 2018/2019 : research & development and innovation by SMEs.

https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/cadb8188-35b4-11ea-ba6e-01aa75ed71a1/language-en

European Parliament. (2014). Directive 2014/24/EU of The European Parliament and of The Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union, 94/65, 65–242. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509923205.0008

European Union. (2020a). Public Procurement - Performance per Policy Area - The Single Market Scoreboard - European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/scoreboard/performance_per_policy_area/public_procurement/index_en.htm

European Union. (2020b). TED CSV open data Notes and Codebook. https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/ted-csv/resource/99798664-6cf7-4429-b53c-4ecac59f1b6a

Flynn, A., & Davis, P. (2016). The policy–practice divide and SME-friendly public procurement. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(3), 559–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15614667

Harland, C., Telgen, J., Callender, G., Grimm, R., & Patrucco, A. (2019). Implementing Government Policy in Supply Chains: An International Coproduction Study of Public Procurement. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 55(2), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12197

Hoekman, B., & Taş, B. K. O. (2020). Procurement policy and SME participation in public purchasing. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00414-z

Karjalainen, K., & Kemppainen, K. (2008). The involvement of small- and medium-sized enterprises in public procurement: Impact of resource perceptions, electronic systems and enterprise size. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2008.08.003

Koirala, S. (2019), "SMEs: Key drivers of green and inclusive growth", OECD Green Growth Papers, No. 2019/03, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/8a51fc0c-en.

Loader, K. (2005). Supporting SMEs through Government Purchasing Activity. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 6(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.5367/0000000053026383

Loader, K. (2007). The challenge of competitive procurement: Value for money versus small business support. Public Money and Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2007.00601.x

Loader, K. (2013). Is public procurement a successful small business support policy? A review of the evidence. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(1), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1213b

Loader, K. (2015). SME suppliers and the challenge of public procurement: Evidence revealed by a UK government online feedback facility. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2014.12.003

Maréchal, F., & Morand, P. H. (2012). Small business participation procurement policy: Subcontracting vs allotment. Recherches Economiques de Louvain, 78(2), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.3917/rel.782.0005

Morand, P. H. (2003). SMES and public procurement policy. Review of Economic Design, 8(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-003-0104-0

Nielsen, W. (2017). Technical Report : Policies that Promote SME Participation in Public Procurement. Technical Report: Business Environment Working Group, September.

Peck, F., & Cabras, I. (2011). The Impact of Local Authority Procurement on Local Economies: The Case of Cumbria, North West England. Public Policy and Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076709356859

Schoenmaekers, S. (2015). The role of SMEs in promoting sustainable procurement. Sustainable Public Procurement Under EU Law, 2014(May), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316423288.010

Stake, J. (2017). Evaluating quality or lowest price: consequences for small and medium-sized enterprises in public procurement. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1143–1169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9477-4

Walker, H., & Preuss, L. (2008). Fostering sustainability through sourcing from small businesses: public sector perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1600–1609. https://doi.o

Downloads

Published

2021-10-24

How to Cite

Nemec, P. ., & Džupka, P. . (2021). DETERMINANTS OF SME ACCESS TO PUBLIC PROCUREMENT: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE VISEGRAD GROUP COUNTRIES . Proceedings of CBU in Economics and Business, 2, 75-80. https://doi.org/10.12955/peb.v2.257