CLINICALLY EVALUATED ACCURACY OF SINGLE GUIDED IMPLANTATIONS WITH TWO DIFFERENT SYSTEMS – PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12955/pmp.v2.193

Keywords:

implantation, loading, planning, protocol

Abstract

Introduction: Guided single implant placement ensures an optimal implant position, enables in-surgery immediate loading, and creates a predisposition for predictable treatment results.

Aim: This article aims to present the surgical and loading protocols and assess the accuracy of two guided implant systems.

Materials and methods: Ten patients missing a single molar were included. The semi-guided procedures with the two implant systems – AB Dental and Alpha Bio-Tec, were randomly assigned to each participant. The computer-assisted planning was performed with Implant Studio (3Shape, Denmark). Surgical guides and long-term, temporary, screw-retained restorations were virtually generated within the 3Shape system. Surgical appliances were printed from SG resin (Formlabs, USA), and crowns were milled from Telio CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Lichtenstein). Planning accuracy was evaluated based on the crown’s fit and relation to the adjacent teeth and antagonists.

Results and discussion: The patients included for preliminary analysis (6 female and 4 male) were with a mean age of 33.42. The youngest was 24, and the oldest 49 years old. There were no surgical and technical complications for the period of evaluation, which ranged from 1 to 3 months. The crown’s fit was excellent in 8 cases. In two cases, minor adjustments were necessary – 1 in relation to the antagonists and 1 to the adjacent teeth. In one case, a healing screw was placed for 48 hours to facilitate adequate soft-tissue space for the Ti-base. 

Conclusion: The preliminary results presented in this report suggest that the clinical and laboratory protocols used for guided implantation and immediate loading are highly efficient.

References

Deeb GR, RK Allen, VP Hall, D Whitley 3rd, DM Laskin, S Bencharit (2017, Dec). How Accurate Are Implant Surgical Guides Produced With Desktop Stereolithographic 3-Dimentional Printers? J Oral Maxillofac Surg.;75(12):2559.e1-2559.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 5. PubMed PMID: 28863884.

Dolcini GA, M Colombo, C Mangano (2016). From Guided Surgery to Final Prosthesis with a Fully Digital Procedure: A Prospective Clinical Study on 15 Partially Edentulous Patients. Int J Dent. doi: 10.1155/2016/7358423. Epub 2016 Jul 14. PubMed PMID: 27493665; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4963589.

Orentlicher G, A Horowitz, D Goldsmith, R Delgado-Ruiz, M Abboud (2014, Sep). Cumulative survival rate of implants placed "fully guided" using CT-guided surgery: a 7-year retrospective study. Compend Contin Educ Dent.;35(8):590-98, 600. PubMed PMID: 25199032.

Pozzi A, M Tallarico, M Marchetti, B Scarfò, M Esposito (2014, Autumn). Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol.;7(3):229-42. PubMed PMID: 25237668.

Beneke A., M Burwinkel, N. Behneke (2012). Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Clin. Oral Implants Res.;23:416–423. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02337.

Pyo SW, JY Lim, KT Koo, J Lee (2019 Jan 7). Methods Used to Assess the 3D Accuracy of Dental Implant Positions in Computer-Guided Implant Placement: A Review. J Clin Med.;8(1):54. doi: 10.3390/jcm8010054. PMID: 30621034; PMCID: PMC6352035.

Mora, M. A., D. L. Chenin & R. M Arce. (2014). Software Tools and Surgical Guides in Dental-Implant-Guided Surgery. Dental Clinics of North America, 58(3), 597–626. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2014.04.001

Lanis A, O Álvarez Del Canto (2015, Mar-Apr). The combination of digital surface scanners and cone-beam computed tomography technology for guided implant surgery using 3Shape implant studio software: a case history report. Int J Prosthodont.;28(2):169-78. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4148. PubMed PMID: 25822304.

Pozzi, A., G. Polizzi, P. Moy (2016). Guided surgery with tooth-supported templates for single missing teeth: A critical review. Eur J Oral Implantol, 9(Suppl.1): S135-S153.

Vlahova, А., V. Hadzhigaev, Chr. Kissov, G. Todorov, R. Kazakova, St. Zlatev (August 2017 – October, 2017). CAD / CAM dental implant planning and surgical guide fabrication. J. Chem. Bio. Phy. Sci. Sec. B, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1307-1314.

Vlahova, A., V. Hadzhigaev, Zl. Tomova, R. Kazakova, St. Zlatev (2018). Implant-supported screw-retained vs cemented single crown fabricated by CAD / CAM technology: A clinical case report. J Dent Oral Care 4(1): 5-7.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-24

How to Cite

Vlahova, A. ., Zlatev, S. ., Pavlov, B. ., Chenchev, I. ., & Hadzhigaev, V. . (2021). CLINICALLY EVALUATED ACCURACY OF SINGLE GUIDED IMPLANTATIONS WITH TWO DIFFERENT SYSTEMS – PRELIMINARY RESULTS. Proceedings of CBU in Medicine and Pharmacy, 2, 178-183. https://doi.org/10.12955/pmp.v2.193
صندلی اداری سرور مجازی ایران Decentralized Exchange
فروشگاه اینترنتی صندلی اداری جوراب افزایش قد ژل افزایش قد