• Simona Butnaru Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences, Iasi



bullying, victimization, separation from parents, truancy, school outcomes


Bullying is an increasingly common problem in schools, associated with negative educational outcomes for both bullies and victims. This study explored the socio-educational family and school variables related to bullying, victimization and positive behavior, such as age, gender, separation from parents, school results, and truancy. In this study 311 students (50.8% boys) have participated, they were aged between 6 and 16 years (M = 11.01, SD = 1.71), enrolled in primary school (47.3%) and in secondary school (52.7%), all were from urban areas. 43.8% of respondents were separated from one or both parents due to divorce (17.4%), parental death (6.1%), migration (20%) or abandonment (0.3%). Bullying, victimization and positive behavior were measured with one standardized scale; the data about school results and attendance of the students was collected from the school registers; family information was self-reported by participants. Because Cronbach’s Alpha for the positive behavior scale was 0.57, lower that 0.7, this scale was not considered for further data analysis. Empirical data for the study was collected before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Mann-Whitney U test showed significant age differences: secondary school students scored higher in aggression than primary school students. We also found significant gender differences in bullying behavior: boys’ reported higher level of aggression. The Independent Sample Student’s t-test indicated gender differences in school results: the boys obtained lower school results in Language and Mathematics than the girls. Separation from one or both parents did not lead to significant differences in bullying behavior, but pupils separated from their parents had fewer school absences than their colleagues not separated from their parents. Pearson’s correlation indicated that students with higher bullying scores, also scored higher on victimization and had higher number of school absences, but had scored lower grades in Language and Mathematics. One-way ANOVA indicated that victimization was influenced by age and bullying was influenced by gender. Also, one-way ANOVA indicated an effect of bullying on school results. Two-way ANOVA showed an interaction effect between gender and separation from parents on bullying. When living with both parents, boys had higher bullying scores, but under separation condition, the boys scored slightly lower than girls. The implications of the results for education and counseling are discussed.


Arslan, G. (2021). School Bullying and Youth Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors: Do School Belonging and School Achievement Matter? International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, DOI: 10.1007/s11469-021-00526-x.

Beldean-Galea I.-E. & Jurcău N. (2010). Studiul calităţilor psihometrice ale unui chestionar de evaluare a fenomenului “bullying” la elevi [Study of the psychometric qualities of a questionnaire to evaluate the phenomenon of "bullying" in students]. Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 12(1), 15-20.

Blakely-McClure, S.J., & Ostrov, J.M. (2016). Relational aggression, victimization and self-concept: Testing pathways from middle childhood to adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 376–390. DOI 10.1007/s10964-015-0357-2.

Bozan, K., Evgin, D., & Beser, N.G. (2021). Relationship of bullying in adolescent period with family functionalities and child behaviors. Psychology in the Schools, 58(8), 1451-1473. DOI: 10.1002/pits.22501.

Chen, I.H., Gamble, J.H., & Lin, C.Y. (2021). Peer victimization’s impact on adolescent school belonging, truancy, and life satisfaction: A cross-cohort international comparison. Current Psychology, 1-18. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-01536-7.

Chen, J-K. & Wei, H.-S. (2013). School violence, social support and psychological health among Taiwanese junior high school students. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37(4), 252-262. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.01.001.

Crick, N. R. (1996). The role of overt aggression, relational aggression, and prosocial behavior in the prediction of children’s future social adjustment. Child Development, 67, 2317–2327. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01859.x.

Gherasim, L. R., Butnaru, S., & Măirean, C. (2012). Classroom environment, achievement goals and maths performance: gender differences. Educational Studies, 39(1), 1-12. DOI: 10.1080/03055698.2012.663480.

Hamburger M. E., Basile K. C., Vivolo A. M. (2011). Measuring Bullying Victimization, Perpetration, and Bystander Experiences: A Compendium of Assessment Tools. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.

Lodder, G. M. A., Scholte, R. H. J., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Giletta, M. (2016). Bully victimization: Selection and influence within adolescent friendship networks and cliques. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 132–144. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-015-0343-8.

Montero-Carretero, C., Roldan, A., Zandonai, T., & Cervelló, E. (2021). A-Judo: An Innovative Intervention Programme to Prevent Bullying Based on Self-Determination Theory—A Pilot Study. Sustainability, 13(5), 2727. DOI: 10.3390/su13052727.

Oriol, X., Varela, J., & Miranda, R. (2021). Gratitude as a Protective Factor for Cyberbullying Victims: Conditional Effects on School and Life Satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research. Public Health, 18, 2666. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052666

Samara, M., Da Silva Nascimento, B., El-Asam, A., Hammuda, S., & Khattab, N. (2021). How Can Bullying Victimisation Lead to Lower Academic Achievement? A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis of the Mediating Role of Cognitive-Motivational Factors. International Journal of Environmental Research. Public Health, 18, 2209. DOI: ijerph18052209.

Schacter, H.L., Lessard, L.M., Kiperman, S., Bakth, F., Ehrhardt, A., & Uganski, J. (2021). Can friendships protect against the health consequences of peer victimization in adolescence? A systematic review, 13(3), 578-601. School Mental Health. DOI: 10.1007/s12310-021-09417-x.

Sevcikova, A., Machackova, H., Wright, M.F., Dedkova, L. & Cerna, A. (2015). Social Support Seeking in Relation to Parental Attachment and Peer Relationships Among Victims of Cyberbullying. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 25(2) , 170–182. DOI: 10.1017/jgc.2015.1.

Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R., & Slee P. (2011). The Nature of School Bullying. A cross-national perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.

Solberg, M. E., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully Victim Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior. 29, 239-268.

Stevens, V., Van Oost, P., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2000). The effects of an anti-bullying intervention programme on peers' attitudes and behaviour. Journal of Adolescence, 23(1), 21–34. DOI:10.1006/jado.1999.0296.

Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school : what we know and what we can do. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

Ttofi, M.T., Farrington, D. P., Lösel, F. & Loeber, R. (2011). The predictive efficiency of school bullying versus later offending: A systematic/meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21(2), 80–89. DOI:10.1002/cbm.808.

Zhang, M., Wang, Z., Persram, R.J., Wong, T.K.Y., & Konishi, C. (2021). Perceived Social Support From Family and Peers: The Association With Bullying Behaviours. Journal of Education and Development, 5(1), 17-29. DOI:10.20849/jed.v5i1.835.

Zhao, Y.P., Hong, J.S., Zhao, Y.F., & Yang, D.L. (2021). Parent-child, teacher-student, and classmate relationships and bullying victimization among adolescents in China: Implications of school mental health. School Mental Health, 13, 644–654. DOI: -10.1007/s12310-021-09425-x.




How to Cite

Butnaru, S. . (2021). SOCIO-EDUCATIONAL CORRELATES OF BULLYING IN THE SCHOOL CONTEXT. Proceedings of CBU in Social Sciences, 2, 66-72.