THE INTERNET AS A COMMUNICATIVE TECHNOLOGY AND ITS POLITICAL VALUE

Authors

  • Mikhail S. Konstantinov Southern Federal University, Institute of Philosophy and Social & Political Sciences, Department of Theoretical and Applied Political Science

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12955/pss.v2.221

Keywords:

political ideology, cognitive-ideological matrices, student consciousness

Abstract

The work presents some results obtained in the process of implementing two sociological studies of the consciousness of students in the South of Russia, conducted by the research team of the Southern Federal University in the period of 2014-2016 and 2018-2019. Methodologically, both studies included a series of free group interviews, questionnaires and focus groups. Analysis of the data obtained shows a significant shift in the sentiments of student youth towards greater opposition to the current government: if in 2015 less than two-thirds of the respondents (60.6%) believed that radical changes in Russia were impossible, then in 2019 more than two-thirds of respondents expected serious shocks (72.4%). Among the key reasons for the growing tension in Russian society, students name socio-economic (42.2%) and internal politics (50.0%). But the greatest resonance in the student mind is caused by the attempts of the Russian authorities to control the Internet. Thus, according to a survey conducted in 2019, 37.4% of respondents consider the Internet the most important source of information, and another third (29.5%) point to the anti-constitutional nature of these laws. Therefore, Internet restrictions may well become an annoying factor: 39.7% of those surveyed declared their readiness to take part in protests, if there are any. The analysis shows that the communicative value of the Internet is at a much deeper level of the cognitive structures of student consciousness than traditional political values. The value of Internet freedom turns out to be one of the most basic values for today's youth, comparable to fundamental values such as social connections, recognition, identity, etc.

References

Converse, P. E. (2006). The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 18 (1-3), 1-74.

Freeden, M. (2006). Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jameson, F. (2002). The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. London & New York: Routledge Classics.

Konstantinov, M. S. (2018). Cognitive-ideological Matrices. Politika razvitija, gosudarstvo i mirovoj porjadok: Materialy VIII Vserossijskogo kongressa politologov, Moskva, 6-8 dekabrja 2018 g. [Development policy, state and world order: Proceedings of the VIII All-Russian Congress of Political Scientists, Moscow, December 6-8, 2018]. Moscow: Aspect Press, 270.

Laclau, E. & Mouffe Ch. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.

Lukichev, P. N., Potseluev, S. P., Konstantinov, M. S. (2019). Language, Religion and Civic Identity. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, LVIII, 514-528, doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2019.03.02.59.

Potseluev, S. P., Konstantinov, M. S., Lukichev, P. N., Vnukova, L. B., Nikolaev, I. V., Tupaev, A. V. (2016). Igry na ideologicheskoj periferii. Pravoradikal'nye ustanovki studencheskoj molodezhi Rostovskoj oblasti [Games on the ideological periphery. Right-wing radical attitudes of student youth of the Rostov region]. Rostov-on-Don (Russia): YuNC RAN.

Potseluev, S. P., Konstantinov, M. S., Podshibyakina, T. A. (2020). Flickering Concepts of Cognitive-Ideological Matrices. Gênero & Direito, 9(2), 807-826.

Žižek, S. (1989). The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso Books.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-24

How to Cite

S. Konstantinov, M. . (2021). THE INTERNET AS A COMMUNICATIVE TECHNOLOGY AND ITS POLITICAL VALUE. Proceedings of CBU in Social Sciences, 2, 200-204. https://doi.org/10.12955/pss.v2.221